you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I don't think posting a link to a sponsored article does help your argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (3 children)

    Sponsored by..UNESDA. Literally the same association that fought for this in the first place. This helps my argument immensely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    If they fought for this in the first place then why did they sponsor an article discrediting themselves?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Not everything works like Trump being unable to admit your mistakes. These organizations are commonly interested in improving EU, not purely selfish motives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago*

    I have no idea where you have the idea from that UNESDA was for tethered caps, at any point. You linked to an ad from UNESDA from before 2020 and quoted a contract PWC study from that time. All against it. Many of the assumptions in that study have become either obsolete or were shown to be wrong.

  • source
  • parent