you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The more you electrify, the less primary energy you need. Soooo...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    High temperature 24/7 industrial processes? Reduction equivalents and chemical inputs?

    To start with, look at how renewable energy infrastructure is made and deployed, starting with mining.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Mining isn't really as big of a deal as the fossil fuel industry likes to make it out to be. ≈99% of solar arrays, wind turbines, and batteries are recyclable, meaning that the scrap will be the richest source of ore in a short order. Maybe a decade or so

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Starting with solar PV. The dopants are not retrievable, the silicon too contaminated for PV use, silver, ok, glass panes -- probably not recyclable, melting down can perhaps be done with electric heating. Aluminium profiles, ok. Copper wiring, partly. Renewable infra at scale by the way needs so much copper it will exhaust minable ores.

    So unfortunately PV is a dud recycling-wise and needs so much energy to process you can do it from scratch. Same thing with batteries, especially sodium. Wind, concrete and composite not recyclable, steel and rare earth magnets yes, copper yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    I mean, there are high temperature heat pumps, or electrical ovens, depending on what you mean. Reduction can be done by Hydrogen, new facilities for steel production are basically built this way (in Europe) and I don' know what you mean with chemical inputs.

  • source
  • parent