you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (1 child)

Seems like it would be more computationally expensive to tokenize letters instead of words. You would get more granularity (spelling errors in the training data suddenly matter a lot more.) But now you have increased the number of tokens that need selected by 5 or 6 times on average. So sure, they can get around having to completely retrain the models but wouldn't this increase operating costs ultimately?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago

    I believe so. They do not mention a change in model architecture which reduce the compute for these byte-level models. So it would be expected that compute costs of token generation increase proportionally with the average increase of tokens with respect to current subword tokenization. I have just read the paper here and they seem to combat the increase compute cost with their efficent self-attention method, I do not see a mention of this here, so I only assume that the internal model architecture remains the same, and thus it is expected that the larger context length and time to generate a token will be the main issues.

  • source
  • parent