you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Charge them with some form of fraud of even a light form of treason. Selling foriegn goods under the guise they are Canadian is unfair to true Canadian products and fucking disgusting from a national pride perspective.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I've been saying for years that I'd vote for some random guy that ran on throttling and holding accountable grocery chains and telecoms. Nearly a decade ago I had a friend in Thailand with a full cell phone plan with unlimited data ect. for $8/month, why is it so insanely expensive here?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    We supplement rural infrastructure, Canada has a lot more than Thailand

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That's the telecom's talking point. It's true to some extent, but why do Bell and Rogers keep making record profits every year?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Their goal is profit.

    If we wanted a non-profit we could lightly steer as a populace to ensure it's modern and safe while remaining its most affordable, we would have brought it in as an arms-length crown corp.

    We still can, if we wanted that, but we have to understand the realization of delayed or skipped maintenance on infrastructure and the huge costs we have to support to bring it back into line publicly if we do. The gov can't half-ass anything without blowback.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Canada has poor competition and oligarchy controls

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Yea that balloons municipal budgets to the point they nearly need to run a growth ponzi scheme where they need new suburban developments to pay for the maintenance of existing suburban developments, all well neglecting existing transit and density and making new density nearly illegal to build.

  • source
  • parent