In high school physics, I learned that the equation for energy from moving something is a factor of force and displacement. So if an object remains stationary, then no matter how much force is put into it, no energy is expended.

So how come if I hold a heavy box filled with dumbbells, I get tired? I'm obviously putting a lot of newtons into it to keep it from falling, but it's not moving. So how is the weight of the object causing Me to expend energy?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A thought experiment: If you ease the bumper of a car against a concrete wall, and then press the gas pedal all the way down, the engine will expend a lot of energy but perform no useful work. The chemical energy in the fuel is burned, but all of the effort is wasted, converted into heat and noise.

What you describe is the same. Your muscles burn chemical energy (fat, sugar, etc.) whenever they try to contract. At the microscopic level, they are moving quite vigorously. Whether or not that results in any macroscopic motion (i.e., kinetic or potential energy) depends on the situation. Straining to lift an object that is too heavy is not an efficient use of what those muscles could do, just like the car pushing against an immovable wall.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Huh. So if I expend the same amount of energy lifting a light object and holding a heavy object, I'll get hotter when holding the heavy one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 3 points 1 month ago

    In principle, yes. In the lifting scenario, a portion of the work done by your body becomes potential energy of the weight, so only some behind waste heat. In the holding-up scenario, all of the energy becomes waste heat.

    In practice, though, I don't see how you'd know exactly when to stop in order to meet the "same amount spent" condition.

  • source
  • parent