▲ -24 ▼ Liberals: "we can vote "socialism" in!" The person they're allowed to vote: (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 month ago by trainsrkool@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago (3 children) https://eliku.medium.com/left-anticommunism-612908583ec4 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wezzzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) Okay so the us has put out a load of anti comunist propeganda? Big wow thanks for eductating me i geuss :) i was already aware of this sadly and my critisisms come from a way different side i am simply anti autorytarian and i think shit like a strong state with a strong survalance network is bad for democrecy so id like to avoid that end yk (sorey for bad spelling im not the best at english ^^) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) think shit like a strong state with a strong survalance network is bad for democrecy It's only bad for democracy if your idea of democracy is choosing between two puppets of your actual rulers every few years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wezzzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago Thats only the case if you would asume i like capitalism or the state at all which i stated i dont :/ if there is a group of power they can and will control elections using enprisonment media control and economic factors if there are non thats way harder to do :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wezzzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) Okay so the us has put out a load of anti comunist propeganda? Big wow thanks for eductating me i geuss :) i was already aware of this sadly and my critisisms come from a way different side i am simply anti autorytarian and i think shit like a strong state with a strong survalance network is bad for democrecy so id like to avoid that end yk (sorey for bad spelling im not the best at english ^^) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) think shit like a strong state with a strong survalance network is bad for democrecy It's only bad for democracy if your idea of democracy is choosing between two puppets of your actual rulers every few years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wezzzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago Thats only the case if you would asume i like capitalism or the state at all which i stated i dont :/ if there is a group of power they can and will control elections using enprisonment media control and economic factors if there are non thats way harder to do :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) think shit like a strong state with a strong survalance network is bad for democrecy It's only bad for democracy if your idea of democracy is choosing between two puppets of your actual rulers every few years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wezzzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago Thats only the case if you would asume i like capitalism or the state at all which i stated i dont :/ if there is a group of power they can and will control elections using enprisonment media control and economic factors if there are non thats way harder to do :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wezzzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago Thats only the case if you would asume i like capitalism or the state at all which i stated i dont :/ if there is a group of power they can and will control elections using enprisonment media control and economic factors if there are non thats way harder to do :) permalink fedilink source parent