I mean… A24 can say whatever they want. The fact remains that the art they are producing is derivative of prior art, and that prior art has an intentionally very broad license that also applies to derivative art (and, you know, basically the entirety of the SCP article catalogue is derivative art in the first place). I don’t expect this would hold up well for A24’s lawyers if they actually try to go after people again.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments