you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 1 month ago (12 children)

you seem to understand exactly what was exaggerated

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    What's your definition of "constantly pregnant"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    I didn't care for your semantic interrogation. it's obvious the user was exaggerating for effect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    How you gonna quibble over semantics then tell them off for semantic interrogation?

    Something being pregnant for 75% of its life is pretty constant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    it's not 75% of their lives, either. they're not able to breed when they're calves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Senor Semantics does it again!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    75% isn't semantics. it's a statistic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (5 children)

    You just said it wasn't 75%.

    And quibbling over what constitutes 'most of' something's life is semantics. I reckon plenty of folks would view anything over 50% would likely constitute 'most of'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I never said anything about "most of".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)