484
US coal ‘biggest contributor by far’ to rise in global emissions (www.thechemicalengineer.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So, is it easier to change the behavior of 3500 people who can do whatever they want, 340 million people most of whom have some choices in their lifestyle, or 1.4 billion people of whom about half are just doing what it takes to survive?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    "Easy" is irrelevant. The climate doesn't care about which is easier.

    The simple fact is that China accounts for 1/3 of total global emissions. If the US went completely carbon neutral today, global emissions would be cut from 38.6 Billion tons to.... 33.7 Billion tons.

    If China went completely carbon neutral we'd drop from 38.6 Billion tons to 26.3 Billion.

    Everyone needs to cut their emissions. China is actively doing the most damage to the climate, however.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    If Elon musk contributed 90% as much as all of Germany would you be equally happy saying Germany's 80 million people held more responsibility than Musk for their emissions? Per capita is the only measure that makes sense as it is how much each person is contributing.

    Another way of looking at it, Yunnan creates far less CO2 than the USA so by your logic the USA is worse than it. Repeat for every other Chinese province.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent