you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There is no way the latency can be less than a DSLR when looking through the viewfinder. Dslrs just use a mirror there. I'm saying I couldn't keep up with a dragonfly zipping around in midair because the viewfinder made it impossible to keep it in focus. On a DSLR it was relatively easy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The latency between what you see and when the picture is taken is mechanical, using the viewfinder on a SLR gives zero latency while using it, but when you press the trigger, there is a latency you will never see.
    With a high FPS screen for the viewfinder, the latency can easily be way below human perception.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yes I know, but the latency between the trigger pull and the photo being taken literally doesn't matter if you can't even frame your subject. Look I like mirrorless cameras a lot. But to say that DSLRs have no advantages over them is untrue. There are still situations where mirrorless cameras are not as ideal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment