832
reason enough to fail the interview (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
121 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
A picture of Edsger Dijkstra with a concerned face and the following text on top: How software engineers look at your code when you solve the problem using two tables — instead of using the Maxwell-Ross-Karmakar algorithm, which is marginally optimal in ordered sets bijectable to the exponential curve
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is like saying “the physicist’s answer would have errors because they measured the ball and then stuck it in an oven. The volume of the ball in the oven is different than what they measured.”

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    No it's more like the physicist tried to use boiling water to measure it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Using boiling water is still fine, the measurement will work, your comment literally only is a problem if they don’t measure in time. So yes, it’s exactly like sticking it in an oven and not measuring at the same time

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •