you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 44 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Sorry but I think Hayden Panettiere was the first of this round of 3

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    What a fucked up way for me to find out..that Hayden Panettiere was actually 80 😛

    Seriously, though, this one caught me by surprise for sure!

    She was only 36 and, from what little I'd seen of her, she appeared exceptionally wholesome, healthy, and happy as far as I could tell. Reading her Wikipedia after the fact, it turns out I couldn't be much more wrong ☹️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Again, I'm not sure what has you all convinced that the rule of three for celebrity deaths has anything to do with age - it's just about celebrity.

    At any rate, yes Hayden's death was particularly surprising - but these things happen. Life is a fleeting thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Again, I'm not sure what has you all convinced that the rule of three for celebrity deaths has anything to do with age - it's just about celebrity

    I wasn't agreeing to that (highly specious) hypothesis, just found it funny to pretend that anyone could have mistaken Panettiere for an octogenarian 😁

    At any rate, yes Hayden's death was particularly surprising - but these things happen. Life is a fleeting thing.

    Correct.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Too far of a gap to include HP. Now I'm suddenly worried about Mel Brooks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    I'm not sure what has you guys convinced the rule of three has anything to do with age

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments