▲ 334 ▼ Why does God allow evil and suffering? (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 months ago by stemy@lemmy.ml to c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world 87 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] amio@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children) which is not possible without an alternative Oh? So he's not omnipotent then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 months ago (2 children) I'll cite myself one message higher: If your definition of omnipotence includes the ability to do the impossible, then, as a Christian, I have no problem saying that God is not omnipotent, but that is merely a matter of wordplay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] amio@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (1 child) The passive-aggressive "as per my last email" doesn't magically make that bs make sense. You do understand that, right? Omnipotence is defined as "unlimited power". god can't do X -> god is not omnipotent. Extremely simple stuff if you're not an apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] zloubida@sh.itjust.works -6 points 2 months ago Like I said, if it's your definition, then I have no problem saying that God is not omnipotent. It's not a gotcha when I already said that I agreed with that… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 months ago (2 children) I'll cite myself one message higher: If your definition of omnipotence includes the ability to do the impossible, then, as a Christian, I have no problem saying that God is not omnipotent, but that is merely a matter of wordplay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] amio@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (1 child) The passive-aggressive "as per my last email" doesn't magically make that bs make sense. You do understand that, right? Omnipotence is defined as "unlimited power". god can't do X -> god is not omnipotent. Extremely simple stuff if you're not an apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] zloubida@sh.itjust.works -6 points 2 months ago Like I said, if it's your definition, then I have no problem saying that God is not omnipotent. It's not a gotcha when I already said that I agreed with that… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] amio@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (1 child) The passive-aggressive "as per my last email" doesn't magically make that bs make sense. You do understand that, right? Omnipotence is defined as "unlimited power". god can't do X -> god is not omnipotent. Extremely simple stuff if you're not an apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] zloubida@sh.itjust.works -6 points 2 months ago Like I said, if it's your definition, then I have no problem saying that God is not omnipotent. It's not a gotcha when I already said that I agreed with that… permalink fedilink source parent
[+] zloubida@sh.itjust.works -6 points 2 months ago Like I said, if it's your definition, then I have no problem saying that God is not omnipotent. It's not a gotcha when I already said that I agreed with that… permalink fedilink source parent