The musician started dating Australian model Helena Vestergaard in 2013, and they split after being together for approximately two years.

Before that, Kiedis, now 63, had a relationship with Heather Christie, who was 22 years his junior. When the pair welcomed their son, Everly Bear, in 2007, Kiedis was 44 and his partner was 21.

In the latest episode of My Therapist Ghosted Me, Williams and her co-host Joanne McNally discussed age-gap relationships, with the former I’m a Celebrity campmate saying: “Do you know who else I find really disappointing, because I really like the Red Hot Chili Peppers? Anthony Kiedis.”

Seemingly referring to his romance with Vestergaard, Williams continued: “He is like 54 or something, and he is going out with a 19-year-old. And it is like, ‘Dude, what are you talking about?’”

McNally replied: “I've seen this. I just accept now that most men, all men, are drawn to – I'm going to be very careful how I say this – significantly younger women. That's all I'm going to say. It is what it is and I don't think there's any getting away from it. We judge it but it's not going to change.”

“I would have to say that it is not all men,” Williams continued. “Because I do think it is a very specific thing.”

Addressing why younger women might decide to date older men, McNally added: “And of course, people like him [Anthony Kiedis] and rockstars like him can get away with it because no 19-year-old girl wants to be going out with some old lad who is driving a Toyota Corolla around town.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago* (15 children)

Of course I get hate - Lemmy is overwhelmingly white and male. An outspoken queer feminist is not going to gel well with that demographic all of the time.

You not understanding that there are many different types of rape doesn't make me dishonest. Children cannot consent to sex with an adult. It is rape. And more specifically it is statutory rape.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    An outspoken queer feminist is not going to gel well with that demographic all of the time.

    As a trans girl, I'm aware. But I also get to see subtle jabs at AMAB people, like one of your comments in this thread.

    You not understanding that there are many different types of rape doesn't make me dishonest.

    You're dishonest for informing people about statutory rape without calling it that or sharing the details, which makes it seem significantly worse. And I know you know that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    Being cognizant of different biases in how society treats AFAB and AMAB isn't a negative thing. You should be even more aware of the differences in how boys and girls are treated growing up.

    Statutory rape is rape.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    Being cognizant of different biases in how society treats AFAB and AMAB isn't a negative thing.

    What I'm talking about is how you seem to look down on AMAB people in general, based on how and what you say about AMAB people.

    Statutory rape is rape.

    Insisting on leaving out the statutory part when introducing a topic is deliberately misleading to your audience.

    Countering someone who points that out by calling them names and suggesting that they're either a rapist or rape victim is bullying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    The main subject of this post isn't about rape at all.

    There's a lot of positive comments about men in my post history. I don't have patience for men that are unrepentantly sexist though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 2 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

    I responded to a thread about Kiedis confession of raping a 14 year old in his memoir. That's a different scenario than the original story, though they're connected because they're both centered on Kiedis and his penchant for pursuing women and girls much younger than him.

    I mean, Kiedis has the money and power to rape children when he wants essentially. I could see how someone would classify him loosely as part of the "Epstein class".

    You seem really hung up on the difference between violent, forcible rape and other kinds of rape. I'm not sure why you've directed your ire at me on this. I don't view statutory rape as less damaging just because the child may be coerced into saying yes or may think they want to have sex with an adult. Statutory rape is rape.

    I'm married to a man and have a son. Maybe this should be a lesson for you to not make knee-jerk assumptions about people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 2 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    It's not that I enjoy talking about these subjects - it's that I don't think they should be ignored or rug-swept as much as they are. It's infuriating that people want to turn a blind eye to the rape and subjugation of others in our society. That's how Epstein was able to move the way he did, that's how rock stars are able to continue to rape children and everyone just shrugs and says it's not a big deal, that's how the rise of misogyny is enabled yet again these days.

    You dug your heels in and became incredibly nasty yourself in here. Whether it was inadvertent or not, you were defending rapists by being so pedantic about the definition of rape. You almost sounded like someone who follows the streamer Destiny ffs. Pedophilia, ephebophilia, squabbling about the differences in rapists and their victims. That kind of argument is usually used to mask predators and how they operate. When adults are preying on vulnerable people in order to victimize them, to use them for their own selfish sexual wants, it is rape.

    You're right - Epstein did some next level nasty stuff to his victims. By your own admission, you don't know Kiedis. Why are you defending him if you don't know the true extent of his crimes? Isn't it enough to be sour on him for knowingly raping a 14 year old?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Why are you defending him if you don't know the true extent of his crimes?

    I never defended him or any abusive people in this thread. My qualms have always been with your word-choice. Including labeling people as pedophiles or "pedophile defenders" as insults to dismiss them. It's hurtful and harmful. It's wrong to attack people like that and also to conflate "pedophile" with "child-predator" or "child-rapist". I refuse to hate people for immutable traits like that.

    Yet I see that on fedi every time I browse it. It's been bothering me for weeks and today was the day I randomly decided to say something about it. Unlike my meme posts, I didn't make a structured post about it. It's hard to care what people think of me sometimes because I see so many of you as hateful to your core (at least that's what comes across to me). I've spent lots of time trying to be thoughtful in my responses to people in various threads, trying to get people to understand that bodyshaming is unhelpful and not nice, while trying not to seem like the stereotype they're bound to ignore. Ditto the topics discussed in my own threads about computer/tech stuff. I do tend to try to choose my words carefully and take my time responding to everything as thoughtfully as possible.

    This thread was different, partially because I feel like I'm in the presence of people who should be more able to understand and be more likely to be agreeable than the one with the bodyshaming stuff, while knowing that it's likely to feel like shouting at a wall. People follow the numbers, what they perceive to be majority opinions, and most people don't care to rock the boat about things. My view of most people on this platform was already so low that I realized I lose nothing at all by saying whatever feels right in this moment. I'm kinda surprised anyone agreed with me at all, based on my own experiences and what I've seen of this place over the years.

    It's not that I enjoy talking about these subjects

    I think you do. I think you like to be provocative with what you say and how you say it because you want to get a rise out of people and stoke conversations about it whenever possible. That is what I see of you in this thread. Nothing I say has mattered to you at all. We both have mentioned that we do not value each other's opinions and yet you persist because you like to do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (7 children)

    I refuse to hate people for immutable traits like that.

    I don't hate non-offending pedophiles ie people with desires for children that have never acted on them. That's a difficult hand to be dealt and I hope that they get all of the help they actually need in order to never touch a child.

    If that was the angle you were coming from, you did not make that clear at all.

    I think you like to be provocative with what you say and how you say it because you want to get a rise out of people and stoke conversations about it whenever possible.

    Since you refuse to look at post histories, I know you're just shooting from the hip here. Most of my posts see hardly any engagement at all, but I still post. I just also happen to be stubborn. It doesn't help that I'm AUDhd as well so I come off very blunt sometimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 2 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago*

    Saying shit like ‘you’re a pedophile defender’ is like the people who say “you’re gay”

    Also WOW wtf. Are you the type to believe that the LGBT+ community should be opening our world to non-offending pedophiles?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Because we are talking about a pedophile who raped children. Kiedis.

    If you are defending an offending pedophile, you have earned being called a pedophile defender. And there are people who defend pedophiles because they are one themselves.

    I've actually got past comments that touch on this subject, but again, you don't care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    “The next day we drove to Baton Rouge, and of course, she came with us,” Kiedis wrote. “After we got offstage, she came up to me and said, ‘I have something to tell you. My father’s the chief of police and the entire state of Louisiana is looking for me because I’ve gone missing. Oh, and besides that, I’m only 14’.”

    Kiedis continued: “I wasn’t incredibly scared, because, in my somewhat deluded mind, I knew that if she told the chief of police she was in love with me, he wasn’t going to have me taken out to a field and shot, but I did want to get her the hell back home right away. So we had sex one more time.”

    In 1986, Kiedis began a relationship with the actor Ione Skye, the daughter of Donovan, who was just 16 when they started dating, which meant she was a minor in the state of California. At the time, Kiedis was around 24, and the two stayed together for several years.

    In 1989, in a separate incident, during the band’s Mother’s Milk tour, Kiedis was convicted of sexual battery after a show at George Mason University. According to the accusation, he exposed himself and touched his crotch to a woman’s face against her wishes.

    https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/red-hot-chili-peppers-singer-anthony-kiedis-uncomfortable-truth/

    This is who you are defending.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago

    I'm not defending him. I'm discussing your views and the meanings of the words you use. You conflate things which are not the same and you definitely have misplaced hate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I have past comments where I express support for non-offending pedophiles.

    He said in his memoir that after he learned she was 14 years old, he "had sex" with her again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I have past comments where I express support for non-offending pedophiles.

    Then they seem hollow with the other things you've said in this thread.

    He said in his memoir that after he learned she was 14 years old, he "had sex" with her again.

    That doesn't negate what I said, which involves his intentions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)