A "frustrated" teenager drove his car at more than 140mph (225km/h) on his way to the gym before crashing into a taxi.

Max Dangerfield, now 20, was driving in the early hours of 25 January 2025 on the A48 near the Cross Hands roundabout in Llanelli, Carmarthenshire, when he ploughed into the back of a taxi that was taking two women home after a night out.

The taxi driver suffered broken ribs, bleeds on the brain, a punctured lung and a lacerated liver in the crash.

Dangerfield, who was uninsured, was banned from driving for 50 months at Swansea Crown Court on 13 August, and must serve 28 months detention in a young offenders institution.

He must pass an extended test before he can get a licence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 2 months ago (24 children)

Damn, unfortunate, hopefully he dies next time before he can hurt anybody else.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (15 children)

    Jfc. Hopefully he learns how to better handle his emotions*

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Fuck that. Not every life is worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago* (10 children)

    Sure, and we're not capable of administering mortal judgement upon another outside of our defence, but tolerance also has to end somewhere. Like a brick wall perhaps. So let us hope.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    He was 19 at the time, practically a kid dude. People have to be given a chance at some point too. Not just immediately shown the wall.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago* (8 children)

    I wasn't out committing manslaughter at 19 so I guess it's hard for me to sympathize.

    Most cultures treat you as an adult at 18, some as early as 14.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    You act like this shit was premeditated murder, corporeal punishment fetish or some shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (6 children)

    He went 140 MPH and hit somebody.

    The only thing separating him from killing 5 children and their parents is blind luck.

    Sick of people treating cars like they're benign and voids all responsibility for harm done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I'm talking about the fuccen kid who you are wishing death on, the vehicle isnt up for consideration.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    There are no fuccen kids in this story but if there were that dumbass dude would have murdered them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    At 19 you are incapable of properly assessing risk. Medically, clinically, not capable. The brain structures required haven't finished being built yet.

    The realistic answer to the problem is that children shouldn't be given responsibility for multi-ton vehicles capable of such destruction when misused.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    I was passing courses in Philosophy at 17. I wager a literal fucking caveman could understand "car go fast, very danger" but this dude did it anyways, likely more than just this time.

    How many indiscriminate murders did you commit at 19?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Damn dude. I was thinking he should be banned for life from driving as punishment as well as serving a stint in jail but thought maybe that comment might have come across as too harsh.

    But shit, you went all in!

    KILL HIM! REMOVE THIS VOAL FROM MY SIGHT!

    Fucking hell, lad. Scary stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Nobody here is advocating for killing him, we just hope he dies.

    As a mental exercise let's change the tool he used out for a different one: if he had dragged the other person out of his vehicle and beat him near death and unconscious with a metal bat instead, would you still be defending them? Because the results are exactly the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    But he didn't.

    What you're describing is a deliberate act of aggression. Your fictional perpetrator armed himself with a weapon with the sole intention of doing harm.

    This kid didn't get in his car and speed down the street intent on crashing into the cab driver. It was a mistake. A stupid irresponsible mistake. But not a deliberate act. Unless you have evidence the court hasn't heard? This kid had a grudge on the taxi driver? He diddled him on a cab fare? Refused to pick him up?

    Punish this irresponsible kid and ban him from driving. But wishing death upon him. Jesus titty fucking Christ.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    So you don't support the random bludgeoning but you also do support it? Sounds like your conflict is internal, not with me.

    The man's actions led to this and anybody could have told you this might happen beforehand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments