French Art historian Nathalie Trouveroy shared footage with Le Monde from her personal archives of the Tiananmen Square protests, shedding new light on how the Chinese regime violently repressed the student protests in June 1989.

Archived

The linked article contains a video (17 min). Here is an invidious link to this video with the comments being in French.

[...]

The analysis of previously unseen images obtained by "Le Monde" and leading testimonies provide a better understanding of how the Chinese regime gradually shifted to the violent repression of the student demonstrations in the spring of 1989.

Spring 1989, Tiananmen Square. At the heart of the student demonstrations, a young expatriate, Nathalie Trouveroy, films the Beijing protesters, their slogans, their enthusiasm and their fear with her Hi8 video camera. These images, which remained in a family setting for a long time, are unpublished archives obtained by Le Monde.

Her husband, Guy Trouveroy, was then a political adviser at the Belgian Embassy in Beijing. For seven weeks, the couple were privileged witnesses to the regime's hesitation, torn between dialogue, obstruction and repression of the demonstrators. When the movement turns in favour of democratic measures, the communist government sends tanks against the population. On the night of 3-4 June 1989, the massacre took place. The repression would spread throughout China.

Since then, the Chinese authorities have been trying to erase Tiananmen from the collective memory. But, thirty-eight years later, Nathalie Trouveroy's never-before-seen video and photo archives have come to light. With these family images, the Trouveroy couple intend to preserve the memory of the victims of the bloody repression of the Tiananmen movement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 months ago (63 children)

Lmao. No mention of the protestors lynching and burning cops and soldiers beforehand?

  • source
  • hideshow 63 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 months ago (21 children)

    That would be weird since China claims it simply didn't happen. Kinda hard to claim self defense and "that didn't happen" at the same time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    Well I mean literally there was no massacre in tiennimen square. There were clashes in the surrounding area.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Were the goalposts inside the square, or well actually I meant the goalposts near the square?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    There's a material difference between the story most lemmitors insist on, that all the peaceful protesters just wanted freedom, and communists hate freedom so they machine-gunned 20,000+ protesters in the square then ran them over with tanks until there was nothing left and "protesters lynched a bunch of soldiers, took their weapons, and battled cops in the streets. Hundreds of people died in the fighting, over a thousand wounded".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    There is no war in Ba Sing Se

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    American propaganda would make goebbels blush.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    You would know that, wouldn't you...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Uhh, yeah. It's pretty easy to spot, as a non-American.

    You're telling me you trust the government that has lied about every military engagement it's been in since WWII, who's been run by an elite billionaire pedophile child sex trafficking ring?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    This goes to show how little you western fucks know about the government you hate so obsessively.

    China does not deny that people have died during that day. But westerners have made such a big deal out of it when your OWN crimes are far and away worse.

    Your masters are just scared of a non capitalist state showing how full of shit they are.

    You eat your masters' shit with a grin and think that you're some brave freedom fighters for it.

    China is better than you. China is more moral than you. More than France, and more than the fell abomination that is the US.

    Fuck you, every one of you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Wow, that is some hateful racism right there from someone trying to occupy the moral high ground.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (24 children)

    incredible. i hope you’re paid well

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 months ago (17 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    Is that like a racist insult or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 2 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 2 points 2 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (10 children)

    If you don't understand how that could seem racist, I don't know what to tell ya, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (8 children)

    You honestly can't think of a reason why that would be considered racist? You fuckin stupid, bro?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (6 children)
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    I never said it was racist, just that it seems like it could be interpreted that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Not a big fan of history, I see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Your made up version of history or reality?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The Chinese government murdered people who disagreed with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Ah-ha, gotcha! Most of the violence did not occur inside the square itself, but outside it, on the streets nearby!

    iamverysmart.bmp

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I don't know if you think you're supporting china, but you're hurting the Chinese people.

    This isn't a "china bad" thing. I want Chinese people to be able to speak their mind without worry of being murdered, silenced, or jailed.

    I like china in general. Let's try to be better people and not oppress them or come up with alternate realities to not to hurt the feelings of billionaires in charge.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I wish that were true cause they definitely deserved it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    What would looking it up accomplish? There are only two scenarios in this situation:

    1. I feel vindicated because I'm proven right.
    2. I feel happy because I'm proven wrong. Like I said, if it's true, the police and soldiers deserved their fate for supporting an authoritarian regime. ACAB
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Update for what? What would looking further into it accomplish? The way I see it, there are only two possible outcomes here if I look up your claims:

    1. I feel vindicated because I'm proven right.
    2. I feel happy because I'm proven wrong. Like I said, if these claims are true, then the police and soldiers deserved their fate for supporting an authoritarian regime. ACAB
  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)