▲ 497 ▼ YouTube now requires creators to have twice as many watch hours to start earning money (techcrunch.com) submitted 2 months ago by mrdown@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 148 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] NokkR6@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) Actually Nebula pays their creators better. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Sure but how do you get on Nebula? As far as I know it comes from having an established YouTube presence first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NokkR6@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Yeah, unfortunately is the only way. If peertube worked with monetization it maybe would be a better place than youtube. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] deathbird@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago It's also a matter of audience. Part of what lets Nebula work at all is the built-in audience for the creators that are there. Same with droput.tv and c5.now and even means.tv. Peertube will work better as more and bigger creators cross-post to it. Another challenge it faces though is scaling and yes, monetization since there's no subscription system through the platform by default. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Sure but how do you get on Nebula? As far as I know it comes from having an established YouTube presence first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NokkR6@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Yeah, unfortunately is the only way. If peertube worked with monetization it maybe would be a better place than youtube. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] deathbird@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago It's also a matter of audience. Part of what lets Nebula work at all is the built-in audience for the creators that are there. Same with droput.tv and c5.now and even means.tv. Peertube will work better as more and bigger creators cross-post to it. Another challenge it faces though is scaling and yes, monetization since there's no subscription system through the platform by default. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NokkR6@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Yeah, unfortunately is the only way. If peertube worked with monetization it maybe would be a better place than youtube. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] deathbird@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago It's also a matter of audience. Part of what lets Nebula work at all is the built-in audience for the creators that are there. Same with droput.tv and c5.now and even means.tv. Peertube will work better as more and bigger creators cross-post to it. Another challenge it faces though is scaling and yes, monetization since there's no subscription system through the platform by default. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago It's also a matter of audience. Part of what lets Nebula work at all is the built-in audience for the creators that are there. Same with droput.tv and c5.now and even means.tv. Peertube will work better as more and bigger creators cross-post to it. Another challenge it faces though is scaling and yes, monetization since there's no subscription system through the platform by default. permalink fedilink source parent