That's an analysis based on vibes and what "sounds like it should be the case

Nope. That's based on what the ACTUAL conspirators are admitting to conspiring to do.

the claim that the rise in fascist parties is not primarily and overwhelmingly so due to endogenous fascist, xenophobic and Islamophobic tendencies in European countries themselves

It's not realistically possible to accurately quantify the proportions like that (unless "based on vibes"), but regardless, you seem extremely adamant about dismissing contextually crucial perversions of self rule by foreign enemies in order to prevent that the domestic ones are the sole significant culprits and could just as easily go it alone.

That's not only misguided, it's also actively harmful to any efforts to know the problem so that we have a better chance of dealing with it.

somehow the result of external propping up by some kind of Israeli conspiracy psyop

Now you're just trying to build a strawman out of accurate observations 🙄

does not stand to the simple Occam's Razor test

Sure. If you ignore where all the funding, organizing, and strategies for cooperation (between otherwise nationalist fascists from different countries, no less), that would be a reasonable application of the Razor.

Given ample evidence to the contrary, though, it would need complicated reasoning to refute and as such fails the test of the good Mr William of Ockham, Billy to his friends.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. So give such evidence, buddy.

So.. You don't consider world leaders publicly bragging about funding and organizing a fascist takeover attempt of several countries' governments "extraordinary"?

If so, there's probably little if anything else that would persuade you.

antisemitic tropes

Anti-zionism ≠ antisemitism. Don't be like the spokespeople of a fascist apartheid regime.

I'm not saying "the Jews are doing it" based on bigotry. I'm saying "the fascist apartheid regime is doing a lot of it" based on an overwhelming preponderance of evidence.

The evidence already in front of our eyes is enough

Clearly not, in your case.

No reason to dumb down our analysis with some half baked rehashing of the protocols of the elders of Zion.

Agreed. Which is why I wasn't doing anything even remotely resembling that.