you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

No thanks. I don't need a closed source browser from an USA company, promising about privacy. I don't trust them.

The pro-consumer pitch is typical of these startup.

I don't even see the point of paying for their search engine, which honestly feels to me just a viral market stunt on social media to make people believe it's that much different from the dozens free alternatives we already have.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

    Check my post history, I've someone else has done research to discover Kagi just uses Bing Yandex as its indexer:

    they use Yandex as one of their search indexes.. They've also removed all mentions of this fact from their help pages. They also use brave index. You can't choose to not use them and in general they havent been very transparent about the whole thing

    There is no way a fucking startup can catch up to Google that has been indexing the internet for the past 30 years. Microsoft had to purchase the indexer from Yahoo for billions of dollars just to catch up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    I thought I remember a blog post by them explaining how it's impossible to catch up with Google results due to the control they have and money involved, so they have their own indexing service that also pulls from others that they pay for access to (other than Google).

    I may be wrong but that's how I've understood Kagi's results as I've used it for the last 2 years...

    Edit: Found the article

    https://blog.kagi.com/waiting-dawn-search

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Yeah I feel like they have always been open about their results pulling from a range of other search engines.

    That blog post is promising, and a little hilarious. "A search index is human knowledge, it belongs to everyone, that's why ours is proprietary".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Kagi has always been upfront about using other search providers' indexes.

    Per Kagi's current documentation (source), their search results

    include anonymized API calls to all major search result providers worldwide

    That particular page dates back to at least Oct. 2022. It was also mentioned in their FAQ back when they were still in closed beta

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (1 child)

    SearXNG does the same exact thing for free. What are the idiots paying for Kagi getting with their subscriptions?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago*

    It looks like you get what you pay for with SearXNG.

    While SearXNG claims to aggregate results from "more than 70 search services", the "Engines" tab show that most instances only support a small number of engines, and many of these are degraded. That matches my experience of trying SearXNG, where I entered a few queries on a service that randomly picks an instance: Half of those queries failed due to the instance having been rate-limited by the search providers and the other half gave inconsistent and often poor responses. I'm not sure what engine(s) those instances used.

    I guess I could self-host, and configure and maintain just the engines I want access to, but the time required to do so would very quickly exceed the amount of hours I have to work to pay for a Kagi subscription, so it doesn't make much sense economically.

    However, one area where I think SearXNG does have a distinct advantage is privacy, provided that you self-host and only use engines that do not require an API key to access. But that's a tall ask for most people

  • source
  • parent