idk if this is LLM-generated or this is just how humans talk now... I certainly don't prefer it :c

but to offer more substantive criticism: I think the guideline is fine and there's no reason to focus so hard on the "if applicable" part--even the article itself gives perfectly cromulent examples of error text that work great for the scenarios it says "aren't applicable".

of course, I know why the clanker writes like that, and that it doesn't give a shit about what I'm saying. I'm commenting because I think the WCAG guideline is great advice and doesn't deserve to get sloppified by clankers like this.