342
An AI-supervised remote exam went so badly that 58,000 students must retake it (arstechnica.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

I mean AI is totally fine for fine-tuning. Helpful, even. It's a fabulous proof-reader. The issue is using it for a first or second pass, or having it make suggestions for changes.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    I believe the point was they were treated as having used ai because ai sounds like them because it was trained by people with their accent.
    Similar to the "This is not ai, I'm just autistic".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent