They’re just straight up evil.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 52 points 1 year ago (15 children)

They've had a hardon for public broadcasting for thirty years, which is why NPR and PBS have been preparing for this and why their funding largely doesn't come from the feds anymore. It's a hollow victory, it's just depressing because anymore, it seems the right gets everything they want. They get it all. All of it. And we get nothing.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What's sick is that they are a fraction of this country. But thanks to their money and their platforms, they can constantly repeat the lie that "most people are conservatives".

    No, the kind of weird perverted freaks that dream of killing funding to NPR and PBS are definitely not normal and not the majority. But yeah, thanks to a lot of various things, they get what they want....it's sickening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (12 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Second Amendment of the American Constitution: "the right to keep and bear arms".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Yeah, when people post this it means, "shooting people will fix everything." It conveniently ignores that the government has control of the most powerful military in the world. Now, if the MILITARY were also in on the "2A" talk, it would be different, but I very much doubt they will be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    What event in recent history makes you think the US military is any good at dealing with insurgencies? In addition to the most powerful military, the US also has the most heavily armed populace in the entire world. Rebellion here would be a bloodbath of historical propprtions but the people would win. If you call that winning.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    "The enforcement arm of the fascist government is irrelevant."

    I don't see any way this can be true. How do you figure?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Because you think the 2A means "meet an entire military force on a battlefield". Nobody with actual thinking ability would jump to that conclusion, as you have done.

    None of this has anything at all to do with the US military.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    So, when you're out there shooting up law enforcement, politicians, whoever you think killing would help bring down the government - what exactly do you think the response will be? "Oh no, they have guns, we surrender?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)