[2026-07-18] @ETERNALPHYSICS@twitter.com: As the defender, if you miss, there will be no second chance to re-engage, explaining [2] why the US needs to deplete almost an entire magazine to destroy even one single RV.

RVs with terminal speeds exceeding mach 7, are almost immune to PAC3 & other AD systems.

[3] Even with advanced micro-thrusters, matching the lateral maneuverability of a modern Mach 7+ threat presents an agonizing G-force deficit. If a ballistic missile executes even a slight evasive maneuver or trajectory correction at Mach 7, the interceptor must pull an [4] exponentially higher amount of lateral acceleration, often exceeding 30 to 40 Gs, to cross the targetโ€™s path. Because the PAC-3's airframe and internal electronics are bound by structural load limits, trying to match the sheer kinetic agility of a heavy, maneuvering [5] RV can overstress the missile's composite materials or exceed the maximum capability of its dual-control autopilot algorithms.

๐Ÿคฉ

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Recreational Vehicles?

The link isn't working for me.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments