you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

You can have an anarchist cooperative, most anarchists don't like how communism lends itself to strong man politics and cults of personality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I don't know anarchism well enough. I fear that anachisme lead to individualisme too, like capitalisme. Which will lead to an eroding sens of the others. Because we are a social specie, and we need communities. I think housing blocs should be centrally managed like copropriety in Europe, where every owner have a say and a vote. And everybody working in a country for a country should have a home no but.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Anarchism can absolutely extend such housing rights.

    Anarchists are staunchly against capitalism. It's built on community practice. The difference between anarchism and communism is that anarchists actively reject hierarchy.

    Your suggestions of centralized control are concerning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    By centralized control I mean by all owner of the building, (if you are 1 owner you do as you which) I join one the idea that there are practicals advantages to communale housings, one roof, smaller surface since you stack. And proximitie commerces. I would love to be able to bike too.

  • source
  • parent