(and why conservatives hate public schools, ofc)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

It's fine, just list it as "cellulose" on the ingredients list.

(It's not technically sawdust anymore after processing, but it's still gross even though it's food-safe.)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I mean, it's not free, but yes, edible sawdust would be good for the health of most people in the western world. Though they tend to get cellulose from cheaper sources like straw or chaff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment