Photo op (lemmy.world)
🏠️ 2
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -17 points 4 months ago* (15 children)

im sure these idiots just chalk it up to RAcIsM too, privileged just cant understand that some people actually don't want their money and don't want they're country turned into a sideshow.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    Eh, blaming tourists for your local capitalists reorienting the entire economy around them is missing the point. The productive response is to use your government to restrain the capitalists so tourists don't have a negative effect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    Tell that to a lot of 3rd worlder who can't afford local prices anymore, but it seems like many of you frequent fliers dont think or care about your consumerist behaviours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yep, this is a classic issue that could be solved if you have a government that cares about protecting you. You can control how many tourists you let in your nation.

    This mythical government could exist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Napal, Tibet, Tajikistan all limit tourists severely. Meanwhile I buy breakfast in Hanoi from between <1USD and 15 depending if I go to a place that serves locals or tourists. In places where there's competition, I can pay like 2-10USD a night for a bunk to an entire apartment. In places where the local capitalists use the local government to increase their profits at the expense of the workers, I generally avoid because fuck that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Those people literally might not even be tourists. It’s absolutely impossible to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    -the tourist part and you get an even worse problem. Locals (likely profiting of this) vs locals (who don't want the bloat and over competition of local supply to these higher earners who don't even live there) 1st worlders really are stuck in they're own little ideological echo-chamber, the downside of mindless consumerism and unchecked liberalism without a care for who actually facilitated the nation to begin with. It's gross.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    So force the ones profiting to increase supply, failing that, have the government build it themselves. China proves you don't need to let a handful of companies artificially restrict the housing supply and food prices.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Most of these places wouldnt exist without tourism. We see alot of population decrease and eventual vanishing of rural villages. So unless your place is a strategic trade hub or has some remarkeable industry, it most likely only exists because of tourism. The problem however is in these times, tourists money doesnt go to locals but to big international hotel/restaurant/shopping/cruise companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Tell that to the business owners who have families to take care of and are profiting off of tourism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    They'd just do something else if there was no tourism or it never existed, but I'm sure you didn't think about that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Everyone would do something else if there were no profits in what they were doing. If there were no profits in being a farmer then someone would be a plumber and if there were no profits in that then they would do something else. I think it mostly goes without saying that people want to earn money when they have bills to pay and they will do what earns them money

    This comment sounds stupid and that's because it's replying to something stupid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    yes, the idea that your actions dont affect other, it is quite stupid. you don't need others money to be happy but you definitly need it to buy food if you don't grow it or supplys if you don't make it. something many of these people stuggle with because people from out of the country out price you simply because they were born in a wealthier nation, something you definitely don't care about.

  • source
  • parent