you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

That's not true at all, socialism is just worker ownership of the means of production and not related to centrally planned economies. Lookup market socialism for a counterexample.

Socialism - any system of government where the workers own the means of production. This has nothing to do with welfare or healthcare or any of that, just that the working class owns the factories and other private property. (The marxist and original definition of private property is property that generates capital, not your toothbrush, which is personal property. Same with your home.)

communism - a post socialist system where the workers own the means of production, currency has been abolished, there are no class divisions or state (note the marxist concept of the state is probably not what you're thinking if this is new to you.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    marx was not the first just the most well defined but his things came from philosophers before him. This is why the time period and who are talking to is important.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    yes, but none of them use your definitions, those are colloquial ones not used by any communist philosophers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    and again im not talking just communists. its how they like to talk about it and that is why who you are talking about. im thinking in terms of earlier utopian philosophies. similarly many people today say socialism when they basically mean european "ideal" (since so many still fall short) style social democracy

  • source
  • parent