"It takes a village" was a line adopted by Hillary Clinton and the title of one of her many books. Conservatives hated it, because they read it as Nanny State Socialism.

The rebuttal was "It takes a family", with a heavy emphasis on stripping aid and punishing "Welfare Queen" single-mothers, extended family, and other community-based welfare groups. Instead, starting with Reagan and really hitting a high water market with Bush Jr, the conservative focus was on "Faith Based Initiatives", through which religious institutions could tap into federal and state money to provide services as a benefit of church membership. More radical conservative states also pushed for Covenant Marriage, which sought to contractually prohibit divorce. And then there was the fixation on anti-abortion measures, which conservatives believed would discourage casual sex and force more pregnant women into marriage contracts and church membership rolls.

I don't really see any modern liberal still clinging to the Clinton-esque wording, precisely because the Alt-Right has done such an excellent job of demonizing the idea of community support for child care. The modern liberal politician is far more invested in "Abundance" as a panacea, wherein the government uses private subsidies and big public grants to AI research in order to create such vast surpluses that community involvement becomes unnecessary.