Keir Starmer has suggested the US is trying to interfere in British democracy after JD Vance, the US vice-president, blamed the murder of the British teenager Henry Nowak on mass migration.

The prime minister’s office responded after the senior Republican politician claimed in a post on X that Nowak would be alive “if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it”.

Downing Street did not name Vance directly but said its response to his comments was that “in recent days we have seen people trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 5 months ago (6 children)

You’re movin’ like you don’t know the roads at all. Bare white boys get used as fodder. Black gangs are the ones patternin’ the ends.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (5 children)

    I'm sure you believe that. Anyway here's the data: [https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingseptember2025#offences-involving-firearms].

    Anyway, the most violent demographic in this country is men, men killing men all over the land. Regardless of colour or belief or wealth, it's all men.

    What do you want to do to men because they're so violent. I've heard rumblings of deportation, do you want to deport all men, or is deportation not an effective measure for violence?

    Or would you like to drop the nonsense and talk about how you're being robbed blind by the wealthy elite funding your media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 5 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

    ... and suddenly they don't want to talk about violent demographics anymore, thanks for demonstrating my point. It's thought terminating double think all the way down.

    If I can puppet you so easily, just think what billionaires can do to you. I swear I was elbow deep at one point, if you find my watch may I have it back? What would you do if was caught lacking Kermit? Prove my point a third time?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (2 children)

    I don't think you realise what happend to you.

    I said the British right argue in bad faith willing to drop positions the moment they become inconvenient. In that comment I told you I was giving you a bunch of bad faith positions to take up.

    You valiantly took up a bad faith position to defend.

    I made the position inconvenient

    You dropped it.

    You dont like me, you were at your most guard. and I did that to you, and I did that to you in my downtime at work... And I'm an idiot... What do you think Rupert Murdoch could do to you, read the Epstein files and he'll tell you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    You're movin' clueless, bro. Nothin' I'm sayin' is sinkin' in, and you ain't even clocked the situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    You haven't said anything.

    You're movin' clueless, bro. Nothin' I'm sayin' is sinkin' in, and you ain't even clocked the situation.

    See this? Pointless. Do you have anything beyond "nuh uh"? You're just yapping: yap yap yap. Say something.

    You wanted to talk about non-sequitors, then you didn't. You wanted to talk about dangerous demographics, then you didn't. Do you actually want to talk about anything at all? Anything you're not going to drop the moment it becomes inconvenient? Or are you just going to yap away?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)