▲ 267 ▼ Brave is charging $60 for a version of its browser that removes the features you probably never wanted (www.techspot.com) submitted 5 months ago by const_void@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world 47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (8 children) Donate to LadyBird. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 10 points 5 months ago (7 children) The idea behind ladybird is great. I just just wish someone else was at the helm. Kling seems to be kind of a huge douche. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (6 children) Yeah I really don't care about that. There's another part to this story and people just want to hate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) Care to elaborate? I personally wouldn't "cancel" Ladybird as a project, but I do think it's worth pointing out when shitty prople do shitty things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (4 children) They didn't do a shitty thing. Somebody raised a PR for a useless change regarding a developer document. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago (3 children) You clearly did not read what I linked. There's more than that to this situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children) Yes I did. Twice now to make sure I didn't read over something. But I also read the original GitHub PR while it was still open. And what you linked is just an opinion on the situation. I'm on the side of the maintainer. Always have been, always will. You want to be politically correct? Go into politics. Or at least wait until they start translating and branding. There's no need to go and change something that meaningless. It shows you actively went and searched for it, instead of actually helping out the project or staying out of their way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago* (1 child) You missed the "followup" section then, twice. Since it's so difficult, let me help you out: article 1, article 2. I'm starting to think that the quote at the end of the article I originally shared applies to you too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago God you're obnoxious. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 10 points 5 months ago (7 children) The idea behind ladybird is great. I just just wish someone else was at the helm. Kling seems to be kind of a huge douche. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (6 children) Yeah I really don't care about that. There's another part to this story and people just want to hate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) Care to elaborate? I personally wouldn't "cancel" Ladybird as a project, but I do think it's worth pointing out when shitty prople do shitty things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (4 children) They didn't do a shitty thing. Somebody raised a PR for a useless change regarding a developer document. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago (3 children) You clearly did not read what I linked. There's more than that to this situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children) Yes I did. Twice now to make sure I didn't read over something. But I also read the original GitHub PR while it was still open. And what you linked is just an opinion on the situation. I'm on the side of the maintainer. Always have been, always will. You want to be politically correct? Go into politics. Or at least wait until they start translating and branding. There's no need to go and change something that meaningless. It shows you actively went and searched for it, instead of actually helping out the project or staying out of their way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago* (1 child) You missed the "followup" section then, twice. Since it's so difficult, let me help you out: article 1, article 2. I'm starting to think that the quote at the end of the article I originally shared applies to you too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago God you're obnoxious. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago (6 children) Yeah I really don't care about that. There's another part to this story and people just want to hate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) Care to elaborate? I personally wouldn't "cancel" Ladybird as a project, but I do think it's worth pointing out when shitty prople do shitty things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (4 children) They didn't do a shitty thing. Somebody raised a PR for a useless change regarding a developer document. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago (3 children) You clearly did not read what I linked. There's more than that to this situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children) Yes I did. Twice now to make sure I didn't read over something. But I also read the original GitHub PR while it was still open. And what you linked is just an opinion on the situation. I'm on the side of the maintainer. Always have been, always will. You want to be politically correct? Go into politics. Or at least wait until they start translating and branding. There's no need to go and change something that meaningless. It shows you actively went and searched for it, instead of actually helping out the project or staying out of their way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago* (1 child) You missed the "followup" section then, twice. Since it's so difficult, let me help you out: article 1, article 2. I'm starting to think that the quote at the end of the article I originally shared applies to you too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago God you're obnoxious. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) Care to elaborate? I personally wouldn't "cancel" Ladybird as a project, but I do think it's worth pointing out when shitty prople do shitty things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (4 children) They didn't do a shitty thing. Somebody raised a PR for a useless change regarding a developer document. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago (3 children) You clearly did not read what I linked. There's more than that to this situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children) Yes I did. Twice now to make sure I didn't read over something. But I also read the original GitHub PR while it was still open. And what you linked is just an opinion on the situation. I'm on the side of the maintainer. Always have been, always will. You want to be politically correct? Go into politics. Or at least wait until they start translating and branding. There's no need to go and change something that meaningless. It shows you actively went and searched for it, instead of actually helping out the project or staying out of their way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago* (1 child) You missed the "followup" section then, twice. Since it's so difficult, let me help you out: article 1, article 2. I'm starting to think that the quote at the end of the article I originally shared applies to you too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago God you're obnoxious. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (4 children) They didn't do a shitty thing. Somebody raised a PR for a useless change regarding a developer document. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago (3 children) You clearly did not read what I linked. There's more than that to this situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children) Yes I did. Twice now to make sure I didn't read over something. But I also read the original GitHub PR while it was still open. And what you linked is just an opinion on the situation. I'm on the side of the maintainer. Always have been, always will. You want to be politically correct? Go into politics. Or at least wait until they start translating and branding. There's no need to go and change something that meaningless. It shows you actively went and searched for it, instead of actually helping out the project or staying out of their way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago* (1 child) You missed the "followup" section then, twice. Since it's so difficult, let me help you out: article 1, article 2. I'm starting to think that the quote at the end of the article I originally shared applies to you too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago God you're obnoxious. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago (3 children) You clearly did not read what I linked. There's more than that to this situation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children) Yes I did. Twice now to make sure I didn't read over something. But I also read the original GitHub PR while it was still open. And what you linked is just an opinion on the situation. I'm on the side of the maintainer. Always have been, always will. You want to be politically correct? Go into politics. Or at least wait until they start translating and branding. There's no need to go and change something that meaningless. It shows you actively went and searched for it, instead of actually helping out the project or staying out of their way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago* (1 child) You missed the "followup" section then, twice. Since it's so difficult, let me help you out: article 1, article 2. I'm starting to think that the quote at the end of the article I originally shared applies to you too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago God you're obnoxious. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] x00z@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children) Yes I did. Twice now to make sure I didn't read over something. But I also read the original GitHub PR while it was still open. And what you linked is just an opinion on the situation. I'm on the side of the maintainer. Always have been, always will. You want to be politically correct? Go into politics. Or at least wait until they start translating and branding. There's no need to go and change something that meaningless. It shows you actively went and searched for it, instead of actually helping out the project or staying out of their way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago* (1 child) You missed the "followup" section then, twice. Since it's so difficult, let me help you out: article 1, article 2. I'm starting to think that the quote at the end of the article I originally shared applies to you too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago God you're obnoxious. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago* (1 child) You missed the "followup" section then, twice. Since it's so difficult, let me help you out: article 1, article 2. I'm starting to think that the quote at the end of the article I originally shared applies to you too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] x00z@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago God you're obnoxious. permalink fedilink source parent