343
Valve antitrust lawsuit reportedly reveals lengths Steam owner is willing to go to prevent cheaper prices elsewhere (www.eurogamer.net)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
458 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 5 months ago (1 child)

Not really no. Ubisoft agreed to these terms in order to sell their game on steam. If they sold their game on any third party platform, they would agree to the same or even more severe terms. They even made their own storefront specifically so they would have the option to not sell on a third party platform.

They now cry foul because they got all the benefits from selling on steam, but they don't want to pay for any of those benefits.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Yeah it's particularly weird in this case because Ubisoft and Valve both have publisher, developer, and distributor departments within each company. So the agreements they signed and put into place are probably somewhat complex.

    Looking at the Steam page though it says

    Developer: Ubisoft Montreal

    Publisher: Ubisoft

    So in this case it's whatever Ubisoft as a publisher signed / agreed to with Valve when they accepted their distribution terms. These are probably not the same boiler plate terms an indie dev would sign if self publishing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent