you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't entirely agree with this sentiment, personally. Regional areas by definition do not have large populations. There is be work to be done in the regions, and regional employment can and should be increased, but building more infrastructure to accommodate more people would be very expensive per person.

The real solution in my mind is more homes closer to existing services.

We are pretty allergic to densification in Australia, but we desperately need it. Seems to work fantastically for many European cities.

The car has lead to ridiculous urban sprawl in all major Australian cities, and we need to densify so public transport becomes more affordable to expand.

That and ending housing being an investment vehicle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I agree with what you say but still maintain that regional areas can and should be developed intelligently. Having enormous built-up cities can be seen as a positive but also has major downsides in the case of war, major facility breakdown, or stoppage of supply (as could happen if transport breaks down due to lack of fuel). That would be a lot of people close together in a state of crisis. We can only hope that doesn't come to pass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment