I'm actually going to make a separate point from my other comment:

Art is a matter of perspective.

Maybe you don't care about how your toothbrush was designed; but someone somewhere sat down and made decisions about how to best shape it, what materials to use, what kind/how many/what thickness of bristles, how to color it, etc. Those were decisions made from experiences that person had which they chose to factor into their designs.

Someone else out there is interested in what led to those design choices, perhaps to design their own with improvements or changes, perhaps just out of curiosity. They can't ask an algorithm why it made the choices it did and have a discussion about the details; but they could with a person.

What some find disinteresting, others immerse themselves in. AI destroys those opportunities for human connection. Human connection we already struggle to find as a species.

You might not care how this site was created, but some do. The use of an LLM has made it impossible to discuss the choices made, because there weren't any decisions, just an algorithm spitting out letters one after another...

True; however many of the current use cases for AI aren't utilitarian, but are instead forcibly replacing artists while stealing their work to do so. Ontop of this, the infrastructure behind/supporting these tools is destructive and measurably making a significant amount of peoples lives worse.

These factors have jaded people against AI as a whole; as support for AI is seen as support for the destruction and instability it's brought with it.