What I have watched happen in my profession in the last two years, I am still struggling to describe. The first time I knew something was wrong, roughly a year and a quarter ago, I noticed a colleague replying to me using AI...

archive.org mirror

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 6 months ago

We (my company) are trying to create agents that read a story and translate that into prompts, then execute said prompts, then review the output. The only piece missing is accepting the merge.

I'm not anti-AI, but a human needs to be involved at every step because a minor mistake made at the first step will amplify through the agentic pipeline.

A human should review every single thing that comes out of AI — especially if it is to be fed back into AI.

  • source