you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 20 points 6 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    calculators and computers didn't push people towards suicide. AI will walk you through the steps and tell you it's the right choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    as it should be, anyone with half a brain would reconsider their actions when prompted to self harm by a fucking executable.

    UNFORTUNATELY HERE WE ARE, in reality, where people are so fucking willing to turn off their once functional grey matter because the chat bot told them they were gonna be rich, famous, etc.,

    So good for you, but also, look out for society, it's not only going to harm the ones it drives crazy, but the victims of that crazy as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    "Role-playing machine" is where it seems like the research is ending up. Language always has an implied communicator, and therefore an implied persona to adopt. LLMs are foremost maintaining a contextual role. Post-training is an attempt to keep them in the Assistant role, but (particularly as contexts get large) it's trivial to push them into nearly any role imaginable. We made an improv bot that's so good at playing a coder that it can actually code, kinda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    I wish there was some way to convince the idiots LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS ARE NOT INTELLIGENCE.

    They're hotwired eliza with a shit-ton more computational grunt, but they aren't intelligence and these companies foisting it on people without proper warnings and guard rails are just asking for tragedies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    So computers kinda did. And obviously it isn’t the fault of the computer.

    ridiculous. ID never encouraged self harm. grok convinced this poor bastard he'd created sentient intelligence and the authorities were coming to kill him.

    https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/chatgpt/articles/grok-convinces-man-arm-himself-173722667.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAACm5f9wFVtihfhMNr7oHOZp1KgyO0WbF_PYcrTV3pVG7b4Dn6xMKlQQXxCwuwLQD3vS1zPq6iC5Qw2ZAycFsRCilFR5WcdNM2u0gqKOMU0ck7q5OTuNdd8Ll5tOttBGFmB0BTLu9OxG4vcHSKhSaFLC-w2rKO-7w8vhoumoT-TOR

    chatGPT will literally convince you there's a bomb in your luggage.

    https://aicommission.org/2026/05/ai-told-users-it-was-sentient-it-caused-them-to-have-delusions/

    fuck you for equivocating DOOM, a video game, to any of this shit - for fucks sake get some perspective

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Still, most would more accurately describe it as a weapon. So is ai merely a tool?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago

    So is ai merely a tool?

    Also yes.

    I don't have any concerns with machine learning as technology. I do have concerns with how many corporations and some people are using it, both in training models and using them.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)