you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 6 months ago (12 children)

There was nothing subtle about the collaborative invasion of poland

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 6 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Yes, but Poland was jointly invaded. Carved up in a treaty beforehand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] [S] -9 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    Unfortunately for you the truth comes with evidence and doesn't care about your feelings. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -4 points 6 months ago (2 children)
    1. Poland wasnt jointly invaded
    2. It was a non agression pact, similar to other pacts westerners signed with hitler

    truth doesnt care about your propaganda tho

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -8 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    No, none of it was "occupation", nice try tho.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 6 months ago* (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    To say they “collaborated” by using Poland as a battleground is dishonest.

    In the end that was clearly an agreement on when/where the war would begin, as Poland was somewhat Nazi-aligned (but not part of the Nazi project) and the Soviets knew it’d be better to have them as an unwilling buffer than to see them completely allied with Germany.

    Make no mistake, they sent their armies there to fight each other to the death.

  • source
  • parent