you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

so we're clear, that actually is my claim. it is a form of bicameralism. as i recall the men did have some legislative proposal powers. i'll need to crack a book again though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago*

    The men did, but in my understanding the women had ultimate veto power. If the war chief's ceremonial beads hit the ground, that's a death/banishment sentence. They'd give you two chances to stop doing whatever they didn't approve of, but ultimately if the women said no 3 times, you're a dead man.

    The only reason that I don't consider that a bicameral system is that while the men may have been elected, the women were just all the women that lived to a certain age.

  • source
  • parent