Full article: Firefox browser has started shipping Brave's adblock-rust engine

After seeing a lot of backlash over Waterfox adding Brave's adblock engine:

It looks like Waterfox is piggy-backing off of Firefox’s implementation (great!).

And it's been there for a little while.

Mozilla bundled adblock-rust (Brave’s Rust-based adblock engine, the same one my team works on) into Firefox. Pretty exciting to see them finally start taking ad & tracker blocking seriously; I didn’t think I’d see this day. It landed in Firefox 149 via via Bugzilla Bug 2013888.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The mentioned bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2013888

Titled: "add a prototype..."

Description:

This'll be pref-controlled and disabled by default, but will enable some fun playing around, foxfooding, and further development.

So doesn't sound like it's "landing" in the sense that your Firefox instance will actually be running this (yet), I think? Though maybe the prototyping was successful.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    The code has shipped; it is dormant, but can optionally be activated (instructions are in the article, under the "How to enable Brave’s adblocking engine in Firefox" subheading)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Right, so for the vast majority of users, their Firefox instances won't actually be running this, correct?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Right. It's nice to know it's there though, so Waterfox's decision to implement the Brave engine was done with insight from how Firefox itself is implementing it.

    Interesting it's there, though. And that it "just works" like a super light version of uBlock Origin. I wonder what they'll do with it. Mozilla is tolerant with ad blocking (but IMO never wants to support it first-party), but they do have several "tracker blockers" they've been independently maintaining for years with similar methods...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment