โฒ 278 โผ Sam Altman's 'human verification' company thinks its eye-scanning orbs could solve ticket scalping (www.engadget.com) submitted 6 months ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 92 comments fedilink hide all child comments ๐ 2
[โ] richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 months ago (4 children) Sam Altman has so much shifty ideas permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (3 children) Sam's first business was an app tracking each other with you and your friends. It sounded useless at the time but it was probably a precursor idea to surveillance capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) I wanted to build something similar but included a Reddit style posting community. I ultimately didn't because the fear of a hostile takeover like what happened at twitter made me rethink allowing such a platform to exist. I know I wouldn't use any of the data to monitor users, but there's no reasonable way to stop others from abusing the system I created. it would be unethical to create such a system knowing it would eventually fall into some private investment firms hands. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] shynoise@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 child) I mean, you could just not sell it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago when a multibillion conglomerate sets their eyes on you, do you really think anything will stop them from acquiring you? I would rather sabotage the whole product, but what's stopping any of the devs from taking a copy and building it again for the conglomerate? you can't put the genie back in the bottle once you set it free. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (3 children) Sam's first business was an app tracking each other with you and your friends. It sounded useless at the time but it was probably a precursor idea to surveillance capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) I wanted to build something similar but included a Reddit style posting community. I ultimately didn't because the fear of a hostile takeover like what happened at twitter made me rethink allowing such a platform to exist. I know I wouldn't use any of the data to monitor users, but there's no reasonable way to stop others from abusing the system I created. it would be unethical to create such a system knowing it would eventually fall into some private investment firms hands. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] shynoise@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 child) I mean, you could just not sell it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago when a multibillion conglomerate sets their eyes on you, do you really think anything will stop them from acquiring you? I would rather sabotage the whole product, but what's stopping any of the devs from taking a copy and building it again for the conglomerate? you can't put the genie back in the bottle once you set it free. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) I wanted to build something similar but included a Reddit style posting community. I ultimately didn't because the fear of a hostile takeover like what happened at twitter made me rethink allowing such a platform to exist. I know I wouldn't use any of the data to monitor users, but there's no reasonable way to stop others from abusing the system I created. it would be unethical to create such a system knowing it would eventually fall into some private investment firms hands. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] shynoise@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 child) I mean, you could just not sell it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago when a multibillion conglomerate sets their eyes on you, do you really think anything will stop them from acquiring you? I would rather sabotage the whole product, but what's stopping any of the devs from taking a copy and building it again for the conglomerate? you can't put the genie back in the bottle once you set it free. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] shynoise@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 child) I mean, you could just not sell it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago when a multibillion conglomerate sets their eyes on you, do you really think anything will stop them from acquiring you? I would rather sabotage the whole product, but what's stopping any of the devs from taking a copy and building it again for the conglomerate? you can't put the genie back in the bottle once you set it free. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago when a multibillion conglomerate sets their eyes on you, do you really think anything will stop them from acquiring you? I would rather sabotage the whole product, but what's stopping any of the devs from taking a copy and building it again for the conglomerate? you can't put the genie back in the bottle once you set it free. permalink fedilink source parent