174
SDL (Simple DirectMedia Layer) bans AI / LLM code contributions (www.gamingonlinux.com)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/programming@programming.dev
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

So, by your logic I take the kernel source, or parts of it and use them verbatim in my property project?

You can see yourself that you are talking bullshit?

Or course code is and was licensable. Because code is more then hast if, else, for, while.

Ever seen that some code in some projects is dual licensed?

Why would anyone need this if only while projects are licensable?

https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/licence-compatibility-permissivity-reciprocity-and-interoperability

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    What you are referencing is a project using other projects. You very much can take a function use it. Its when what you take starts to resemble the whole that it becomes a problem. But if you see a project and say "hey i like how they store files in this collection.", you can use that. Now if you are making a kernel and rip out code tlthat resembles a kernel then no.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago

    I though a while if i should answer to it. And this is so wrong, and dangerous, that i decided to do.

    First: Such licensing questions are part of my day to day Job. I will explain it to you like i explain it to first semester students:

    A LICENSE defines the terms under which a copyrighted work can be used, distributed and so on. It does not matter what the work is. A few relevant examples:

    • Beats: in the music industry there is a market for beats. If you take a 10 second beat and in-cooperate it in your own music without having a license for it, you are in violation of copyright law.
    • Paintings: You can not have a copyright on the concept of using paint to draw pictures on a piece of linen, you can not have a copyright on the concept of a specific object drawn on linen. You can have copyright on YOUR version of it. If somebody else takes your work, and only modifies it slightly (or for example, include it into a book, that is a copyright-able piece of work), without having a license for it... copyright violation

    So, this brings us back to our topic:

    There is no difference between sourcecode, music, paintings or writings for the purpose of licensing.

    So, as courts established, AI CAN NOT BE CREATIVE and ALWAYS based on other works. Therefore any AI generated Work is in itself are not protected by copyright.

    So, EVERY piece of code that is AI generated is free to go for any purpose, it does not fucking matter if there is a GPL 3.0 header in the file. AI Generated == Public domain.

    But: Projects use viral copyleft licenses for a reason. A company could just take the AI generated code, implement it, and if somebody has a problem with it an just shrug "It's AI generated, it's public domain".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent