cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/57908814

Cunk on boobies

alt-text: Diane Morgan as Philomena Cunk with a post about boobies emanating from a speech bubble above her

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

So my understanding is that normally the enzymes to process lactose are available in newborns.

If we follow the design Mother Nature intended, as soon as we start eating solid foods we stop drinking milk and or body stops producing those enzymes making us effectively lactose intolerant.

But since humans do drink milk the body continues to produce those enzymes.

Some people still lose that that ability and then there are also ones who never had them. That makes them lactose intolerant.

Also being lactose intolerant doesn't kill you, you just can't break it up, so you will have upset stomach, fart etc.

I believe there is a lactose free milk for newborns for those scenarios.

My understanding is that there's lactose in all milk so probably it applies too.

Also besides being lactose intolerant, you can also be allergic to milk, which is much more serious, but that can vary on kind of a milk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, except that you don't gain tolerance simply from continuing to drink milk. It's a regional evolutionary change from many generations continuing to drink milk and the majority of adults across the globe are actually lactose intolerant.

    Worldwide, around 65% of adults are affected by lactose malabsorption. Other mammals usually lose the ability to digest lactose after weaning. Lactose intolerance is the ancestral state of all humans before the recent evolution of lactase persistence in some populations, which extends lactose tolerance into adulthood.

    (Lactase is the enzyme for breaking down lactose.)

    Map showing "An estimate of the percentage of adults that can digest lactose in the indigenous population of the Old World". Europe and parts of Africa as well as the Middle East have higher percentages of tolerance. Asia and Australia are largely intolerant.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactose_intolerance

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    I'm surprised the middle east doesn't have a higher concentration of lactase producers. I was under the impression that's where the Aurochs was first domesticated into cattle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Wikipedia has a decent summary in the History section here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milk#History

    Key points, if I'm understanding things correctly:

    • Early domestication was for meat, leather and draft animals, not for milk.
    • Milk consumption started in South West Asia and later stuck around in Europe, because people there had already settled for agriculture. I think, Middle East was more nomadic?
    • The Middle East also had camels as an alternative milk source, and camel milk contains somewhat less lactose (4.6% vs. 3.5–4.5%), according to this: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8117040/
      So that might've also affected things somewhat? 🫠
  • source
  • parent