I already refuted that point x2

No you didn't. Put the fuck up or shut the fuck up.

That’s an ongoing issue that’s addressed in detail and mitigated in the documentary.

Then why are insurgent campaigns not winning across the board? They're by and large ALL following variations of the exact playbook outlined in the documentary (which is based largely on the Bernie Blueprint, a document we made after the 2016 primary, where we meticulously documented everything that made the campaign work)

What is it they failed to do? Why aren't we always getting the "right results" if insurgent campaigns are (and they by and large are) doing what the documentary identifies as appropriate strategy?

Its because the environment has shifted as a result of the establishment recognizing their vulnerabilities. And thats not to say all of it isn't working, but as a result of the success of insurgent campaigns, establishment campaigns are changing how they operate as well.

Also the number of non voters means there is plenty of opportunity for grass roots campaigns to outreach the outreach of incumbents. The notion that incumbents being prepared for challengers makes primarying them impossible is a non sequitur.

I never said it was impossible, but because of the successes of campaigns like Bernies, AOC, Talib, Omar, Bush, Bowman, and I could go on, because of the success of those campaigns, incumbents recognize the need to change their approaches. And some of those same campaigns, they just lost back in '24 (Bush, Bowman). And, I'm sorry to say, the lost because establishment strategists have had the time to analyze how grassroots campaigns work, and have adjusted accordingly.

Campaigning and campaign strategy is in an arms race, and yes, the suite of 2018 candidates made huge advances on the grassroots side, but the basic outline is hardly a panacea. And if you aren't constantly updating your strategies and also adapting and localizing those strategies to a particular district, you're gonna get smoked. You could not run AOC's 2018 campaign today and expect the same outcome. You need to adapt to the moment.

Also the number of non voters means there is plenty of opportunity for grass roots campaigns to outreach the outreach of incumbents.

Are you suggesting that if a grassroots campaign doesn't win its because they didn't do enough outreach? Why don't you try and be more precise here? You talk like someone who has never been on a campaign, but you said you have, so what campaigns were you a part of?