▲ 29 ▼ Innocent civilian F35 fighter jets (lemmy.ml) submitted 7 months ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/ManufacturingConsent@lemmy.ml 7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml [S] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) That makes her statement worse not better. Now she's framing it like she supports "innocent civilians" dying instead of Israel using interceptors to protect their military bases which is the primary target of the resistance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lorty@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 months ago (2 children) The point is pretending that the "iron dome" is meant to protect civilians and not military assets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago thank you, I needed this explanation permalink fedilink source parent [–] cash@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago It might be meant to protect military assets; doesn't mean it can't protect civilians. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml [S] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) That makes her statement worse not better. Now she's framing it like she supports "innocent civilians" dying instead of Israel using interceptors to protect their military bases which is the primary target of the resistance. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 months ago (2 children) The point is pretending that the "iron dome" is meant to protect civilians and not military assets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago thank you, I needed this explanation permalink fedilink source parent [–] cash@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago It might be meant to protect military assets; doesn't mean it can't protect civilians. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago thank you, I needed this explanation permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cash@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago It might be meant to protect military assets; doesn't mean it can't protect civilians. permalink fedilink source parent