you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

Starting at $1750, they're competing with surpassing Apple in the price department

(Edit: added right price)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    And

    To get the best battery life, you’ll need to settle for 1920 x 1200

    On a 16 inch screen that’s gross

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    To be fair to Dell, Apple's high-resolution displays might have toned-down resolutions too. The Mac Neo ships with a lower default resolution than what it can fully handle, if I understand the settings right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    Still 219 PPI compared to 146 PPI at 500 nits brightness for $500. Granted that iPad chip is going to crawl on some stuff. and the MacBook Air, which is likely far more performant than either is $1099 base instead of $1700+ for the dell. I enjoy all competition but intel chips are still way less performant than the m series in terms of power consumption

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The XPS line has always been their competitor to MacBooks though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    People don’t understand that Apple just never chose to compete in the $500 laptop range, until, well, this year…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    The least expensive current-gen MacBook after the Neo is $1100 (less if you buy a previous generation, which is apparently common practice); the Dell in the article is $1750.

    Apple's other products are expensive, but this is a whole new level of it.

  • source
  • parent