you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Imo an absolute meritocracy would first require a society of absolute equity. Otherwise how would you know if someone is actually more inherently better at something or if they just had more opportunity?

I think meritocracies are a nice idea, but they've mostly been supported by societal elites throughout history because they know it's easy to score when you're born on third base.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] [S] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    That was kinda my point about absolute equality. There will always be people with disabilities and therefore absolute equity and absolute meritocracies are mostly utopian philosophical concepts. Plus, if we're doing idealist delights why bother with anything but luxury space communism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments