Today's development is that I'm committing theft from content creators on YouTube.

OK. So, you think I, as an unemployed writer, am responsible for "content creators"? What the fuck does that mean, anyway? I've shot porn, written lots of columns and editorials, and taken photos.

This is back when we didn't call it "content." So what's your point? Up-and-comers need more money than corporate America and me?

I'm going to need a more compelling argument than "you're stealing if you use an adblocker." I simply don't have the energy to point out that if losing work as an editor makes me a thief, you should direct your ire to the media companies that no longer care to hire us.

If I were making six figures and owned my home, as I should at 46, sure ... fair play. I can afford YouTube Premium. Neither is true, so this feels mostly like a case of "shut up, nationally award-winning pleb who has literally run newspapers; you don't understand the media industry."

And in a manner of speaking, they're right. I understood it only while we had the audacity to commit journalism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 7 months ago (12 children)

How does adblocking affect content creators? Are they paid differently?

Also, I am not going to be forced to watch anything, fuck that. There is literally more youtube video out there than I can possibly watch in a lifetime. I can't be expected to watch all of it, so I only watch the parts I want. It's not stealing, YouTube is offering the same media to me, I just don't particularly like the sponsored portions and ads, the same way I ignore 99% of the other content on the website. It's a personal preference, not a crime.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    On youtube for example, they dont get paid for views where ads were blocked, afaik

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    I've never heard that, would be curious to know. The videos are still marked as watched in my account; that's as much insight as I have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    Creators aren't, as far as I know, actually paid per view, so much as they are paid per ad impression (that's why some people like shoving 10 ads in their videos)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    My understanding was that was how it works for shorts, not for standard videos, but I could be wrong.

    Edit: yeah it isn't pooled for standard videos

    Watch Page Monetization Module

    If a partner turns on Watch Page Ads by reviewing and accepting the Watch Page Monetization Module, YouTube will pay them 55% of net revenues from ads displayed or streamed on their public videos on their content Watch Page. This revenue share rate also applies when their public videos are streamed within the YouTube Video Player on other websites or applications.

    Shorts Monetization Module

    If a partner turns on Shorts Feed Ads by reviewing and accepting the Shorts Monetization Module, YouTube will pay them 45% of the revenue allocated to them based on their share of views from the Creator Pool allocation.

    Source

    In this case I'm fairly sure that "revenue from ads" doesn't mean "when someone clicks an ad and buys the product" (though that might factor in) but rather the revenue gained from advertisers paying to be displayed on the platform, which is generally charged on a per-n-impressions basis

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah that looks like it is the way it is. Which, to be clear, does not change my decision to block ads, as that is based in having a pretty basic level of self respect and appreciation for my own time. But it is good to know, so thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

    From what people I watch say, youtube doesn't pay half the time anyway so what's the difference?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I mean I don't have a horse in this race, I block ads and sponsorships without shame and also support the creators I enjoy directly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    I'm not currently in a financial position to support individuals, though I once did. I find it abhorrent that paying for a service rarely means payment to the actual creatives, just padding corporate profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Agreed. No hate to you for being unable to support creatives, I consider my supporting them as separate from my decision to block ads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments