▲ 346 ▼ GrapheneOS calls on privacy focused app developers to boycott European Unified Attestation (piunikaweb.com) submitted 8 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 16 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/60567571 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116200110686604617
[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 79 points 8 months ago (6 children) why is GrapheneOS using X? If you're trying to convert new people to your religion, you have to leave the church. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago That's what the priest told me when I saw him going into the brothel. Doing God's work permalink fedilink source parent [–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (1 child) Because you gotta go to where the people are else they won't hear the message. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago That argument perhaps held when it was still called Twitter, it's now mostly bots permalink fedilink source parent [–] gog@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago 😂 permalink fedilink source parent [–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 child) Wouldn't the very same argument apply here for the attestation? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] moody@lemmings.world 10 points 8 months ago GOS's argument over the attestation is that it's essentially the same as Google's system. It approves the devices themselves regardless of their security. An approved device isn't more secure in any way just because it's on the list. It's just a way of arbitrarily excluding any OS that they don't like while still allowing devices that are obsolete or behind on security updates. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago That's what the priest told me when I saw him going into the brothel. Doing God's work permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (1 child) Because you gotta go to where the people are else they won't hear the message. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago That argument perhaps held when it was still called Twitter, it's now mostly bots permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago That argument perhaps held when it was still called Twitter, it's now mostly bots permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 child) Wouldn't the very same argument apply here for the attestation? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] moody@lemmings.world 10 points 8 months ago GOS's argument over the attestation is that it's essentially the same as Google's system. It approves the devices themselves regardless of their security. An approved device isn't more secure in any way just because it's on the list. It's just a way of arbitrarily excluding any OS that they don't like while still allowing devices that are obsolete or behind on security updates. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] moody@lemmings.world 10 points 8 months ago GOS's argument over the attestation is that it's essentially the same as Google's system. It approves the devices themselves regardless of their security. An approved device isn't more secure in any way just because it's on the list. It's just a way of arbitrarily excluding any OS that they don't like while still allowing devices that are obsolete or behind on security updates. permalink fedilink source parent