you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This louse was reportedly not harmful to its hosts.

Kinda interested to hear an ethics of science type argument for/against this human-made extinction.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Well, smallpox was definitely harmful to humans, and it's a virus which is different from an animal.

    (...and yes, I know that "harmful to humans" often means "good for the planet.")

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago

    (...and yes, I know that "harmful to humans" often means "good for the planet.")

    that just sounds like ecofascism to me. also, all the viruses I know of never affect just humans but keep mutating and jumping between mammal species. saving the ecosphere can't happen without also saving humans

  • source
  • parent