you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Especially since public transit is usually locally funded (at least in the US), in areas like this the tax base doesn't exist to be able to functionally fund public transit. We would need to completely rethink and re-organize how public transit is funded and rolled out for this to functionally work in remote areas.

Or, you know, we could continue lettings cars be a thing for remote populations kind of like how in some far northern territories people use snowmobiles to get around part of the year because there's simply too much snow to try to use another type of vehicle at all.

I think the latter, having specific types of transportation still be a thing in places where they're needed, makes a lot more sense, honestly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I kind of agree, but I’ll admit, I wouldn’t give up my car. I moved out here because I wanted out of city life and into more nature and quiet life. I only drive into town every 6 weeks for groceries and necessities in bulk and there’s no way I could haul all that on public transit. I want to be in the city as little as possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    Well, like I said, I honestly think public transit doesn't make very much sense for remote areas. I think it makes far more sense to give people the types of transportation that work best for their use case, and in remote areas: that's cars.

  • source
  • parent