you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 8 months ago (25 children)

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (24 children)

    Interesting to hear this perspective when theunknownmuncher has been doing the same throughout my thread with them and this entire post.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (10 children)

    you’re sick and twisted

    Yes dumbass.

    Truly not shaking the dumbass reputation.

    for the record, you don’t care about women getting raped. You literally don’t give a fuck

    your sick, egotistical, selfish world view blocks you from giving a shit. I suspect this world view also extends to other beliefs of yours.

    Go crawl back into the hole where you feel morally righteous

    the other user hasn't said anything that rises to the level of these statements from you.

    try to be civil.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (9 children)

    Meet psychopathy with civility? Interesting response.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (8 children)

    you're just doubling down. try some selfcrit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (7 children)

    I'm questioning your support for psychopathic opinions. Because it is psychopathic to think of animals as lesser beings compared to humans that deserve less dignity, respect, and moral consideration.

    That is what both you and theunknownmuncher are defending. Disgusting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    i haven't supported any opinions at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    You're telling me to be civil while theunknownmuncher's beliefs are allowed room to breathe.

    You take a side when you do this because these types of belief should be silenced. Genocidal, violent, psychopathic beliefs should not be given platforms to fester online.

    Telling me to be civil is muting the response needed to counter these horrific ideas. This type of apologia and these kinds of ideas contribute to furthering domestication and slavery of animals.

    You are being the equivalent of a US Liberal telling Leftwingers to follows rules and procedures to counter Right-wing fascism. Ideas of oppression, no matter the group of people or species of life, need to be shunned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    I haven't said they're lesser. I don't think they did either, but it's possible I missed it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (12 children)

    No, I never make personal attacks or ad hominem. The fact that you've stooped to this level shows that your argument has failed and you cannot use logic or reasoning to back it up.

    What does it say that you've downvoted the message "Personal attacks are not welcome here". I think everyone should support that message.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (11 children)

    You made a personal attack when you put words in my mouth and forced me to take a position I never held.

    I'm defending myself accordingly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    You made a personal attack when you put words in my mouth

    no, they didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (9 children)

    Theunknownmuncher said that I trivialize the experience of human rape victims. I never said anything that would trivialize their experiences. I advocated for broadening the scope of what we call rape to more than just humans. It's anthropocentric to think that only humans can be raped.

    Does this sub encourage bad faith discussions? That seems to be against the principle of civility.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Theunknownmuncher said that I trivialize the experience of human rape victims.

    i think it's reasonable to say that when you compare a veterinary procedure to rape.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    Artificial insemination is not a veterinary procedure though. It's a forced action on a animal that violates their consent.

    How the fuck do y'all not recognize this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Artificial insemination is not a veterinary procedure

    it is. denying it doesn't change reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    I advocated for broadening the scope of what we call rape to more than just humans. It's anthropocentric to think that only humans can be raped.

    I've never contested this. We agree on this point. Continuing to argue it is a strawman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Then why won't you say that artificial insemination IS rape?

    Because that's my whole argument. It has been my whole argument, and will continue to be my whole argument, regardless of how much you try to derail the conversation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments